Supreme Court Advocates Early Adoption of CBSE’s Three-Language Policy from Class 6

The Supreme Court of India has recommended a significant shift in the implementation of the Central Board of Secondary Education’s (CBSE) three-language policy, suggesting that it should be introduced in Class 6 rather than Class 9. This statement was made during proceedings on Thursday, as the court examined a plea from the Tamil Nadu government regarding the establishment of Navodaya Vidyalayas across all districts.

The discussion surrounding the three-language policy was prompted by a circular issued by the CBSE on May 15, announcing that students in Class 9 would be required to study three languages starting July 1, two of which must be Indian. However, some justices expressed concerns that introducing a third language at this late stage could add undue stress to students, particularly as they approach crucial Class 10 board examinations.

Justice BV Nagarathna, one of the presiding judges, remarked that the introduction of a third language should ideally be halted by Class 9 rather than initiated. She highlighted the increasing pressure on students as they prepare for board exams, which often begins in Class 8. The court’s observations reflect a growing concern about the academic burden placed on students during critical phases of their education.

Earlier, the Supreme Court had declined to suspend the three-language policy for the academic year 2026-2027, emphasizing that language learning is a valuable skill that should not be disregarded. The petitioners arguing against the implementation of the policy during the middle of the academic year expressed worries that it would disrupt students’ preparations and add to their workload.

This development puts the focus back on the broader implications of language education in India, where regional linguistic diversity plays a pivotal role in cultural identity. The debate over the three-language policy also reflects ongoing discussions about educational reforms, the pressures of modern schooling, and the balance between academic rigor and student well-being. As the court navigates these complex issues, it raises fundamental questions around how best to prepare students for a multilingual future while ensuring their mental and emotional health is safeguarded.

Source: scroll.in