Kejriwal Raises Concerns Over Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma’s Impartiality in Liquor Policy Case

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Arvind Kejriwal has expressed serious concerns regarding the impartiality of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, who is presiding over the liquor policy case in the Delhi High Court. During a hearing on Monday, Kejriwal, who appeared in person, articulated his belief that Justice Sharma’s conduct and her decisions outside the courtroom have led him to doubt whether he would receive a fair trial in the proceedings initiated by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

Kejriwal’s remarks came as part of a petition requesting that Justice Sharma withdraw from the case, which involves a challenge against his discharge. He pointed to what he described as a troubling pattern where numerous orders have consistently favored the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and CBI. According to him, every argument put forth by these agencies has been seemingly supported by the court, thus raising his apprehension about the fairness of the judicial process.

The former Delhi Chief Minister elaborated on his concerns by noting the rapid pace at which hearings related to his case have unfolded, contrasting it with the slower resolutions of similar matters faced by his political adversaries, whom he referred to as the “most prominent” figures in opposition. He questioned why this particular case is being prioritized, especially given the implications it holds for his political career and that of his party.

Additionally, Kejriwal hinted at a perceived ideological connection between Justice Sharma and the central government, particularly after she attended an event organized by the ruling party. This appearance has further fueled his belief that the judge may be biased, raising questions about the judicial independence that is critical in high-profile political trials. The AAP leader’s statements reflect a broader concern within the party regarding the judicial system’s integrity, especially in cases that hold significant political ramifications.

This situation has not only sparked debates about judicial impartiality in India but also underscores the ongoing tensions between the AAP and the central government. As the case progresses, the implications of Kejriwal’s claims could resonate throughout the political landscape, influencing public perception and trust in the judicial process. The outcome of this legal battle may have far-reaching effects on Kejriwal’s political future and the AAP’s standing in Delhi.

Source: scroll.in