Mumbai Court Grants Bail to Ex-TISS Student Accused of Supporting Jailed Activists

A former student of the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Abhirup Paul, has been granted bail by a Mumbai court after being arrested for allegedly shouting slogans in support of activists Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, who are currently incarcerated. The court’s decision was reported on Friday, marking a significant moment in a case that has drawn attention to issues of academic freedom and dissent in India.

Paul’s arrest took place on August 7, just hours after he and a fellow student were denied anticipatory bail by a sessions court. The prosecution’s case against them not only includes the slogans but also alleges that they possessed downloaded books and other materials reflecting Maoist ideology. These accusations raise concerns about the broader implications of such charges against students, particularly in an academic environment where freedom of expression is essential.

The case has its roots in an event that took place in October 2025, which commemorated the death anniversary of GN Saibaba, a former Delhi University professor known for his activism. Saibaba, who suffered from significant disabilities and used a wheelchair, was imprisoned for over seven years under allegations of being linked to Maoist activities. He was acquitted by the Bombay High Court in March 2024 but sadly passed away in October 2024 due to complications following surgery. His case has become emblematic of the struggles faced by many activists in India.

In the aftermath of the commemoration event, the police filed charges against Paul and his fellow students based on a complaint from the TISS administration. The first information report cited serious allegations such as undermining national integrity, inciting enmity among different groups, and illegal assembly. Notably, during the same proceedings, seven other students were granted anticipatory bail, highlighting a complex legal landscape that has implications for student activism and institutional authority.

The Mumbai court’s decision to grant bail to Paul may reflect a nuanced understanding of the essential balance between national security and individual rights, especially in a democratic society. This case underscores the ongoing debates around dissent, academic freedom, and the rights of individuals to express support for political prisoners. As the situation evolves, it remains to be seen how these legal challenges will impact not only the students involved but also the broader discourse surrounding freedom of expression in India.

Source: scroll.in